Looking at Customary Institutions within the Framework of Living Law: A Conceptual Analysis
Memandang Lembaga Adat dalam Kerangka Hukum yang Hidup: Sebuah Analisis Konseptual
Abstract
Introduction: The recognition of village customary institutions in Indonesia has undergone a fundamental transformation following the enactment of Government Regulation No. 55 of 2025. For decades, these institutions functioned merely as symbolic cultural ornaments without substantive juridical authority within the national legal architecture, despite their constitutional recognition under Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This study examines the paradigm shift positioning village customary institutions as active legal subjects empowered to handle customary criminal offenses through the doctrine of living law embodied in Article 2 of Indonesia's new Criminal Code. The research aims to analyze how regulatory provisions transform the legal status, duties, and authority of these institutions from rhetorical recognition into functional recognition with legally binding force.
Method: The research employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, combining statutory, conceptual, and historical analysis. Primary legal materials, particularly Government Regulation No. 55 of 2025, are synthesized with secondary materials including scholarly works on living law theory by Eugen Ehrlich and recognition theory by Axel Honneth. Systematic document review and literature analysis serve as data collection techniques.
Results: The findings reveal a substantial upward shift across four institutional dimensions: legitimacy increased from 30 to 95, criminal jurisdiction from 10 to 85, judicial capacity from 20 to 90, and fiscal autonomy from 40 to 75.
Conclusions: Village customary institutions now possess authority to conduct deliberations involving the civil service police unit, with decisions enforceable through district court rulings, while codification through regional regulations functions as a constitutional filter ensuring alignment with Pancasila and human rights.
Keywords:
##article.fullText##
References
Arifin, F., Astawa, I., Maarif, I., Sulastri, D., & Abdullah, M. (2025). Recognition of Customary Norms Within the Framework of Indonesian Legal Positivism. Khazanah Hukum. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i1.39409
Fadillah, F., & Cahyono, L. D. (2025). Dinamika Legislasi Indonesia dalam Kerangka Demokrasi Deliberatif. Jurnal Kajian Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.63082/jksh.v1i4.28
Fuchs, W. (2021). Ehrlich’s Living Law as a Concept of Multi-normativity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351842684_Litigious_Bukovina_Eugen_Ehrlich's_Living_Law_and_the_Use_of_Civil_Justice_in_the_Late_Habsburg_Monarchy
Hariri, A., Wicaksana, S. U., & Arifin, S. (2022). A Critical Study of Legal Positivism As a Legal System in a Pluralist Country. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12131
Hiarej, E. O. S., & Santoso, T. (2025). Anotasi KUHP Nasional (Y. S. Hayati (ed.); 5th ed.). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
